For the U.s. Economy in the New Year, the Pain Will Precede the Promise
January 22nd, 2009
Author: Money Morning
If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”
Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure we know. That period of darkness will be marked by a dramatic slowdown in economic activity, as well as by rising unemployment, additional declines in U.S. stock prices, and constant volatility. It could last as long as 12-18 months.
But when the dawn does come, it will be one to remember. If U.S. President-elect Barack Obama gets it right - and I have every reason to believe that he will - then investors will be presented with the greatest investment opportunity of our generation. At that point, shares of American companies will be at such low levels that wholesale buying by individuals, mutual funds, pension funds, institutional money managers, and foreign-controlled sovereign wealth funds, will generate gains that will not only make us whole, they will make us rich once again.
A Market Mandela
Creating an analysis of the U.S. economy’s outlook for the New Year is akin to creating a mandala, a geometric work of art whose pattern, symbolically or metaphysically, represents a microcosm of the universe from the human perspective. In some Buddhist temples, mandalas are made of tiny colored beads, painstakingly created by several monks as a form of meditation. In celebration of the ever-changing nature of the universe, the mandala is then joyously shaken by its creators, until it is once again nothing more than chaos embodied in a box of colored beads.
Regardless of the big picture, analysis of a mandala - or the economy - always starts at the center and emanates outward. With the U.S. economy, that centerpiece is credit. The credit crisis has shaken the complex mandala that is our economy and transformed the United States economy into chaos. It’s complex because this economic-forecast mandala derived its form from thousands of individual pieces - in the case of the economy, from scores of data points, many of which are currently dark and foreboding.
The credit crisis we are experiencing results from the contraction - or worse, the cessation - of lending. Under normal circumstances, institutions and markets freely facilitate capital movement between lenders and borrowers. But that’s not happening, now.
Because of a lack of transparency into the balance sheets of borrowers holding such complex and illiquid securities as collateralized debt obligations, credit-default swaps, and non-performing loans, and because of increasing recessionary fears affecting businesses and households, lenders don’t want to increase their loan exposure. Banks are holding onto the cash and liquid securities they control, using them as a cushion against their own potential losses. The U.S. Treasury Department’s direct-to-bank capital injections do not alter these banking realities. In fact, as a Money Morning investigative story recently demonstrated, instead of using these taxpayer-provided infusions to increase their lending, these banks are using the money to finance takeover deals.
The Recipe for a Recession
Whether or not the United States is technically in a recession ultimately will be divined by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). The business-cycle dating committee of this privately run, nonprofit economic research group is right now studying five factors in an attempt to determine if the United States has entered a recession and, if so, when that downturn started, MarketWatch.com reported. Those five factors are:
- Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
- Industrial production.
- Employment
- Income.
- Retail sales.
Regardless of any formal announcement by the NBER of whether we’re in a recession, the credit crisis guarantees a general contraction of economic activity, by every measure.
“Any doubt that we’re officially in a recession can be put aside,” Anthony Karydakis, former chief U.S. economist for JPMorgan Asset Management (JPM) - and now a professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business - recently wrote in Fortune magazine. “The rapid deterioration of labor markets points to a sharp decline in hours worked and output in the fourth quarter. This is likely to lead to a decline in personal consumption to the tune of 5.0% or so for that period. Since [consumer spending] makes up about 70% of the economy, the stage has already been set for real GDP to shrink at a more than 4.0% rate in the fourth quarter.”
Confirmation of that belief is evident by looking at each of the NBER’s five key indicators.
- Gross Domestic Product (GDP): The U.S. Commerce Department estimated that the U.S. economy, as measured by GDP, rose 0.9% in the first quarter. In the second quarter, GDP advanced an estimated 2.8%. For the third quarter, GDP declined an estimated 0.3%. My own econometric models suggest that GDP actually contracted at a 1.5% pace in the third quarter and will decline another 2.75% in the fourth quarter. For the year, that would mean the U.S. economy actually fell 0.55%. The U.S. economy last posted a full year’s negative GDP in 1991, when it declined 0.2%. Verdict: Recession.
- Industrial Production: This measure of output by the nation’s factories and mines dropped 2.8% in September, and a very steep 6.0% in the third quarter. Verdict: Recession.
- Employment: The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Friday that October’s unemployment rate was 6.5%, a jump of 0.4%, which was double what most economists expected, and also its highest level in 14 years. The economy has now lost a total of 1.2 million jobs since the beginning of the year, with nearly half of those losses occurring in the last three months alone, pointing to an acceleration in the pace of erosion in labor markets. Karydakis, the Stern School professor, wrote in
Fortune : “By way of comparison, during the 2001 recession and in the sluggish growth that followed in 2002-03, the unemployment rate reached a peak of only 6.3%, in June 2003. We’ve already exceeded that mark and, given that we are still in the early phase of the current recession, the unemployment rate should be expected to push toward the 7.5% range - and possibly higher - during the next three months to six months.”
Verdict: Recession. - Income: Personal income increased $24.5 billion, or 0.2%, and disposable personal income (DPI) increased $25.7 billion, or 0.2%, in September. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) decreased $33.6 billion, or 0.3%. Excluding the rebate payments made to U.S. taxpayers under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, DPI increased $30.3 billion, or 0.3%, in September, and increased $44.0 billion, or 0.4%, in August. Verdict: Too close to call.
- Retail Sales: October retail sales are coming in well below already-diminished expectations, and some reports have been downright depressing - including The Neiman Marcus Group Inc. -26.8%; The Gap Inc. (GPS) -16%; The Nordstrom Group (JWN) -15.7%; J.C. Penny Co. Inc. (JCP) -13%; Kohl’s Corp. (KSS) -9%; Ltd. Brands Inc. (LTD) -9%; Target Corp. Inc. (TGT) -4.8%; and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) +2.4%. In a report last week, Moody’s Investors Service (MCO) projected that the retail sector’s woes will continue into 2009 as consumers cut back on buying apparel, footwear and accessories “in order to save money for essentials.” The credit rating firm said in a separate report that holiday spending “will prove even weaker than expected,” amid October’s financial-market swoon. Verdict: Recession.
If U.S. exports are taken out of the GDP calculations going back to January, it’s apparent that there has been very little domestic growth in the economy. And when revisions are finalized in the next few months, we’ll be looking back at the recession that we’re all but certain is upon us right now. Until the credit markets are freed up and borrowers are extended credit at reasonable rates, it’s unlikely that credit, the centerpiece of the economy, will be anything other than a major cog in the wheel.
There are some signs of a thaw, but not anytime soon. The U.S. Federal Reserve’s lowering of the Fed Funds target rate to 1.0%, and coordinated rate reductions by the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, as well as other major world-wide central banks, may start to ease the stranglehold gripping the worldwide credit markets. The London interbank offered rate (Libor), a critical interest rate against which trillions of dollars of mortgages, bank loans and derivatives are priced, dropped to 2.39% last week from a high of 4.82% on Oct. 10.
The prospect of President-elect Obama’s choosing a different means of attacking the credit crisis will be closely watched and, by itself, may create an air of confidence that perceptions will change. But changed perceptions will not be enough.
The truth about our economic outlook is that it is predicated on demonstrably better transparency. If U.S. banks follow the lead of their European counterparts, which have recently been freed from fair-value, mark-to-market accounting, and which may retroactively mark assets to “internal models” back to July, then balance-sheet clarity will continue to be cloaked in darkness. Lack of confidence in the banking system will persist, especially among the banks themselves. The first order of attack needs to be the creation of a fundamental leadership position that leads to an open, transparent and accountable measure of balance sheet assets and liabilities. As long as failing banks are being propped up, this cycle of credit contraction will persist.
The outlook for the economy is inextricably tied to the price of oil. The run-up of benchmark crude this summer to the record $145 a barrel level, and its subsequent fall to half that level, has wreaked havoc throughout the economy. Similarly, the run-up in commodity prices, and their subsequent fall, also has caused a lot of damage. Together, the dramatic rise and fall in the pricde of oil and other commodities is a harbinger of greater volatility in the future.
Follow the Money
Follow the money. Capital rapidly inflated the tech-stock bubble. When that bubble burst, capital flowed into and flooded the hard-asset world of real estate. When that bubble burst fast, speculative money dove into oil and commodities. When the U.S. and world economies looked weak, those bubbles burst. The looming threat of inflation this past summer instantly gave way after the drop of oil, gold, metals and agricultural commodities. And now, deflation is seen as the looming threat on the horizon.
Which threat should we worry about?
The answer is - both. The prospect for near-term deflation seems all too real. As raw material prices fall and finished good prices fall due to a lack of purchasing power resulting from lack of credit and world-wide recessionary fears, the U.S. consumer has fundamentally changed his or her collective psychology. Is U.S. consumerism, which is responsible for 70% of GDP, in full retreat? If it is, as all measures project, then it’s likely that government stimulus efforts will overshoot their intended mark.
Just look at what the United States has done already as it battles this financial crisis. It has:
- Handed out more than $150 billion in stimulus rebate checks.
- Floated a $700 billion financial bailout rescue plan - almost $160 billion of which has already been placed.
- Bailed out American International Group Inc. (AIG), to the tune of $125 billion.
- Covered JP Morgan Chase & Co.’s bet on taking over
The Bear Stearns Cos. - to the tune of $29 billion. - Looked to lend struggling automakers $25 billion.
- Agreed to guarantee depositors at all banks.
- Stepped in to buy commercial paper that no one else will buy.
- Guaranteed money-market-fund investors.
- And backstopped the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE).
And now we’re getting wind of another stimulus package and more help for everyone.
If, in six months to a year, the credit markets are facilitating borrowers again, the massive buildup of U.S. debt will result in a falling dollar and higher interest rates.
That spells inflation.
A massive re-inflation of the economy portends another flood of speculative money into oil and commodities. The cycles are increasingly condensed, more volatile and will be increasingly more disruptive.
Welcome to the brave new world of global finance and speculation.
The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion to more than $1.8 trillion. That’s 13% of GDP. The Treasury Department has telegraphed its intention to float $550 billion of debt in the fourth quarter and estimates it will have to float another $368 billion in the first quarter of 2009. Our national debt will then be close to 49% of GDP.
If there is an easing of credit in the economy, and borrowers come to market with the pent-up demand that has not been met for the past year, the competition for funds will raise interest rates. Higher interest rates will counter any stimulus effect from government programs.
Who will buy U.S. Treasury debt if the world is less apprehensive about credit quality? Lenders will once again seek higher returns, potentially forcing the Treasury Department to increase its rates. The potential of this event may sink the dollar if investors perceive that the U.S. economy is stagnant and the world is awash in dollars. The yield curve - the spread between the Treasury’s two-year and the 10-year paper - has been steepening. A steepening yield curve, where short-term borrowing costs are low and long-term rates considerably higher, is good for banks that borrow short and lend long.
But if the perception of risk diminishes, and the perception of future inflation increases, the yield curve will invert and the threat of rising rates will cause a sell-off in the short end of the curve and a rush into longer-dated maturities. Any increase in short-term interest rates would be painful for struggling banks. An inverted yield curve would be devastating, and inevitably would lead to more bank failures.
Home on the Range …
At the core of the U.S. economy sits a desperately ailing piece of the mandala - the U.S. housing market. The once bright prospect of home ownership, which historically formed a beautiful economic picture, right now doesn’t exist. For most Americans, the family home constituted the bulk of their wealth. Or at least it did. And this family financial portrait will get worse before it gets better, since the real estate collapse is far from over. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), for instance, projects another 15% drop in housing prices.
I think that’s conservative. Mortgage rates are actually rising as Fannie and Freddie have to pay higher interest on their short-term notes and bonds. Thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage paper averaged 6.47% last week, up from its 52-week low of 5.36%. The 15-year fixed paper was trading at 6.18%, up from its 52-week low of 4.91% (based on Bankrate.com (RATE) rate surveys). This trend is definitely not our friend. As housing prices continue to fall, and inventories stagnate and grow in many areas, homeowners are increasingly underwater and are increasingly entertaining foreclosure as a viable economic alternative to indentured servitude.
The Hope for Homeowners Plan, which looks to lower interest rates and reduce principal on mortgages, and which makes homeowners pay a share of the appreciation on their home to their lender when they sell it, was initiated in October and was expected to garner some 400,000 takers. As of last week, according to The Wall Street Journal, there had been only 42 takers. That’s not a misprint - 42 - I even checked with The Journal.
In the real estate realm, the proverbial “other shoe” hasn’t dropped yet, but certainly is dangling - and that’s commercial real estate. As homeowners writhe in agony and stop spending, retailers will go out of business, businesses of all stripes will suffer and commercial real estate will implode. The leverage left over from just the private equity foray into commercial real estate in the acquisitive 2006-2007 period is staggering. Refinancing will be impossible. Banks are stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of leveraged loans that they took on as bridge and mezzanine financing from the private-equity shops alone, at the time believing they would be able to securitize those loans and sell them off to investors.
There’s no chance of that, now.
One deal in particular illustrates this entire mess. Private equity behemoth The Blackstone Group LP (BX) took Hilton Hotels Corp. private for $26 billion. Blackstone put up $6 billion of its own money as equity and borrowed the other $20 billion from Bear Stearns, Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Deutsche Bank AG (DB), Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley (MS), Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (MER) and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: LEHMQ).
Based on a current analysis of the deal at the multiple of seven times projected cash flow that the market currently puts on Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. (HOT) - Hilton’s nearest rival - if Blackstone values its property comparably, it will have to mark its Hilton holdings down 50%, because it paid 13 times projected cash flow. That wipes out all of Blackstone’s equity in the deal. What’s more, the $4 billion portion of the loan that Bear Stearns took on, courtesy of JP Morgan Chase casting off Bear’s orphaned liabilities, now sits on the Fed’s balance sheet - and isn’t likely to go anywhere anytime soon.
Until the real estate cycle completes its implosion and begins to stabilize, there’s nothing that will fundamentally alter the outlook for the economy. This is Ground Zero. President-elect Obama must resist creating only a political solution to the overwhelming economic problem of declining house prices and declining real estate prices in general. Any attempt to put a band aid on this economic plague will only delay the day of reckoning. I regret deeply the conclusion that the lake must be drained before we can realistically climb out of it. But there just aren’t enough ferrymen to get us all to shore.
Always a Silver Lining - My Forecast
The outlook for the economy is not rosy - and that’s an understatement. But there is a silver lining. Even in the near term, the stock market will present innumerable wealth-creation opportunities.
- First, there are plenty of shorting opportunities out there now, and more will present themselves in the future.
- Second, in due course - in perhaps 12-18 months - we will be presented with the investment opportunity of our generation. If President-elect Obama gets it right, and I believe he’s got the potential to bring us all together and get the country through this (and if you’re reading this Mr. President-elect, I’d like to put in my vote for [New York Fed President] Timothy Geithner as next U.S. treasury secretary), American companies will be able to be purchased so cheaply that fortunes will be made. The recovery will not only make us whole, it will make our people and our nation rich again.
I have absolutely no doubt that the United States will lead the world back into balance. The sea change that has arrived is the result of the conservative experiment having lost its true moorings, pushing the economy into disaster. Not that a wholesale swinging of the pendulum to the other side would be good. In fact, it would be disastrous. We have the potential to end up with a new, fair, transparent and judiciously regulated environment where capital formation can again spread its wings and the U.S. economy can fly.
There are new hands reaching into the colorful box of beads that comprise the American landscape and economy. From any human perspective, the United States is more than a microcosm of the universe; it is the center of the world as we know it. It will take time to construct the new mandala. We all need to meditate on the process to ensure that the design we embrace will ultimately be inclusive, forward-looking and - like all great art - an inspiration to all who view it.
[Editor’s Note: Contributing Editor R. Shah Gilani has toiled in the trading pits in Chicago, run trading desks in New York, operated as a broker/dealer and managed everything from hedge funds to currency accounts. In his recent investigation of the U.S. credit crisis, Gilani was able to provide insider insights that no other financial writer or commentator could hope to match. He drew upon the experiences and network of contacts that he developed through the years to provide Money Morning readers with the “real story” of the credit crisis - and to propose an alternate plan of action. It’s a perspective on the near-financial meltdown that more than a quarter-million readers have read in Money Morning alone - to say nothing of the hundreds of other Internet outlets worldwide that have picked up and published Gilani’s unique insights.
How can you protect yourself? Well, with the U.S. financial markets in such disarray, Money Morning is looking for profit opportunities beyond U.S. borders. In our newest report, we’ve discovered a firm that’s been posting quarter-after-quarter of earnings surprises - even as the rest of Wall Street tanked. Not only does this company have a lock on China - the fastest-growing market on the planet - this corporate gem is also riding the profit wave of the most-powerful global trend we’re following right now. If you act immediately - as an added bonus - you’ll also receive a free copy of CNBC analyst Peter D. Schiff’s
New York Times best-seller, “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”
What’s Happening to our Once-robust Economy?
December 17th, 2008
Well, we all know what’s happening. Major corporations are folding, people are losing their jobs, houses are being foreclosed on in record numbers, people who’ve never needed public assistance now do, and our overall standard of living is declining on a daily basis.
No one knows where the bottom is, or how long a come-back will take, if that ever happens. Some of the companies who made our great, vibrant economy what it once was, either no longer exist or are in serious financial trouble.
We’ve tried just about every trick in the book; reducing interest rates, bailouts and stimulus packages. Nothing’s helped, despite the best efforts of our greatest financial analysts and wizards.
The question is: What’s really happening to our economy?
If you went to the same restaurant for years, ate great food and came out feeling fine, then, as the restaurant deteriorated you kept coming out sick after every meal, would you think your ailment stemmed from this restaurant? Of course. Would you have to be a doctor or virologist to come to this conclusion? Certainly not. All you’d need is a half a brain.
What’s the one other thing in our society that’s been deteriorating in lock step with and in almost the exact same proportions as our economy?
Ethics and morality.
Even diseases are sometimes tracked down through nothing more than logical associations. It was that initial connection between Legionnaires’ Disease and the Bellevue-Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia, for example, that eventually led to the source of Legionnaires’ Disease.
If we were to track down what’s ailing our economy in the same way scientists track down some diseases, moral and ethical decay would stick out like a soar thumb. And you don’t have to be a religious person to make this connection.
We’ve been through recessions and depressions before, but nothing like this one. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Sunday, September 14, 2008: The depressed state of our economy is a “once in a half century, probably once in a century, type of event.”
If our moral values of yesteryear, when the economy was relatively stable, were far superior than they are today, and our moral values today, when “coincidentally” our economy is in a state of unprecedented upheaval, are at an unprecedented low, you think there might be a connection? There seems to be no other common thread.
Strangely, our predicament has an eerie resemblance to a story in the Bible — Adam and Eve getting kicked out of the Garden of Eden and their standard of living radically reduced. I’m not saying there’s a connection; that would be ridiculous. But you have to admit the resemblance is uncanny, albeit our circumstances are on a much larger scale.
What sets today’s decadence apart from that of yesteryear is that some decadent behavior today is no longer seen as wrong. In some cases, people are even proud of their decadence.
There’s probably little need to point out the areas in which morality and ethics have declined in recent years; I’m sure we can all come up with lists. But I would like to point out two areas that epitomize the problem.
Having babies out of wedlock is no longer the shame and stigma it once was. In the 1950s a movie or rock star who had a child out of wedlock created a scandal. Today, it’s announced with beaming pride. It even turns into a delightful guessing game — who’s the father? The lack of outrage by the public shows how ingrained this acceptance has become among Americans.
I understand, we live in a more enlightened age and we’re a whole lot smarter then previous generations. We certainly can’t go back to those ignorant days of yesteryear.
But if we’re so much smarter and more enlightened, how come we can’t figure our way out of the deep financial mess we’re in? This is not being facetious; this is a legitimate question. People who are smarter are usually able to figure out things that less intelligent people can’t — that’s what intelligence is. Many previous generations lived in relative comfort and luxury; we’re losing homes, jobs, nest eggs, worrying about putting food on the table, and we can’t figure out how to get out of it. Are we really smarter, or has our arrogance simply led us to blindness and stupidity?
The other glaring difference between today and years gone by is the widespread acceptance of homosexuality as just another lifestyle. What’s worse, gays have parades proclaiming how proud they are of their decadence. If you told someone only 50 years ago that this would one day be the case, they’d laugh in your face.
And the public’s attitude toward this? “Well, everyone’s got their rights.”
First, I find the public’s acquiescence to this abomination absolutely mind-boggling. Gays will have a parade anywhere they can swing it. Should you object on the basis that you don’t want your family or kids exposed to this, it’s doubtful gays would give a rat’s you know what. Gays will selfishly push their agenda on you, your family, your kids, your kids’ schools, whenever and wherever possible, regardless of how you feel about it and regardless of your right to bring up your family as you see fit. And the average American is okay with this?
This is just weakly caving in to others’ demands. If such behavior were imposed on us by a tyrant government, we’d be up in arms. But if it’s an “enlightened” perversion, that’s okay.
Gays have all the rights other citizen have. They can get jobs, start businesses, rent apartments and get (traditionally) married, like everyone else. We do not need laws to accommodate the lifestyles of people who like sleeping with the same sex, sheep or inflatable dolls. And we certainly don’t need them pushing their perversions down our throats.
The public’s acceptance of this abomination, with the often heard words, “They have their rights,” is little more than gutless, spineless passivity. We have as much right to our lifestyle as they think they have to theirs.
How would you feel about a parade through your neighborhood of fathers and daughters or mothers and sons who are proud that they live together as couples? Probably not very supportive.
How about if they were all consenting adults, didn’t hurt anyone, were so happy together, and just wanted to bring up a normal, loving family together? You’ve got to admit, these are some pretty noble intentions. To most Americans, though, this probably wouldn’t make much of a difference.
Aren’t we just a bunch of intolerant bigots and hatemongers — we have so much hatred and intolerance for fathers, mothers, sons and daughters?
Could this be an issue of morality? Well, what’s morality?
That’s a good question: what is morality, anyway? What makes one thing immoral and another thing, like washing dishes, for example, not immoral. After all, incest — among consenting adults, of course — has the potential of bringing blissful happiness to some family members. Washing dishes, on the other hand, only goes so far in bringing happiness to another family member. So shouldn’t incest be more moral than washing dishes?
The answer is that morality has nothing to do with what makes you happy or how noble your intentions are. Morality was not invented by humans. Morality has no other origin but the Bible. Accepting any traditionally immoral act as “moral” essentially does away with the entire system of morality, since there is no discernable difference between their underlying principles.
Homosexuality has always been around. But what makes it so galling today is that what has been traditionally considered an abomination has turned into an acceptable lifestyle, and supporting it has turned into a “noble” cause. How perverted has our society become?
In light of what we consider acceptable today, it makes one wonder how Sodom and Gomorrah got such a bad wrap.
Of course, you’ll always find people who don’t believe in this Biblical stuff. But what surprises me is how many people do believe in God yet never entertain the thought that what they do — in terms of right and wrong — has a direct impact on the events in their lives. God is not part of our democracy; He didn’t ask you if you want to be born, He won’t ask you when it’s time to go, and He obviously didn’t ask anyone when it was time to bring prosperity levels down a few notches.
A correlation between the decline of ethics and morality and the collapse of our economy is hard to deny. Sure you can attribute our economic problems to corporate or governmental mismanagement and go into the intimate details of what mistakes CEOs or officials made. You didn’t expect God to come down with a bunch of angel/accountants to throw things out of kilter, did you? The way it unfolded is the way it happens.
A belief in God and the basic tenets of the Bible alone do not make for a religion. We don’t have to worry that having laws based on Biblical values will make for a “government-sponsored religion.” Using time-tested principles to lay down the foundation for a society is as practical as collecting taxes.
Societies that frown upon Biblical values, like Communist states, for example, will usually allow themselves to perpetrate gross human rights violations, in many cases killing people with little more concern then killing animals.
On the other hand, when the Bible’s tenets are perverted, you can wind up with “religions” that condone murder. Neither the Ten Commandments nor the Old Testament (the root of most major religions) sanctions murder.
The seeds for our current decline were planted as far back as 1962, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Union Free School District No. 9 in Hyde Park, New York, had violated the First Amendment by directing the Districts’ principles to cause the following prayer to be said aloud in class: “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our Country.”
Isn’t it ironic that things have gotten so bad today that it seems as if the only one who can help us is God? It’s almost as if God is talking to us. Maybe we’re just not listening.
The way I see it, we have the choice of fighting either one of two battles. We can fight the battle to save our economy, which we’re already fighting, in futility. Or we can fight the battle to restore previous levels of ethics, morality and integrity. The difference is, if we win the latter, we win both battles; there’s a scriptural axiom: Do God’s will, and He will do yours.
High Return Investments, The Simple Ones Are The Best
November 9th, 2008
Author: Sacha Tarkovsky
Do you want a simple high return investment that you can understand, can invest in easily, pay no management fees and have the chance over the next 6 months to make 50 – 100%?
Then this article is for you.
This investment is one a commodity where demand is set to increase dramatically and the commodity is natural gas which we covered here in an article at the weekend.
An investment in gas is environmentally friendly, easy to do, diversifies your portfolio and can produce gains far in excess of your stock or mutual funds.
It’s a simple buy and hold strategy. Here is the background:
High crude oil will drive natural gas prices higher
Crude oil prices are expensive, natural gas prices are cheap.
Many utilities are making the switch now to natural gas. With oil prices high natural gas pick up the slack
Crude oil is affected by geo political concerns and the US is dependant on imports. On the other hand natural gas is produced domestically.
Supply will lag demand
Demand is on the move and at the moment supply exceeds it but not for much longer and this is hat will turn natural gas into a high return investment.
New fields are not coming on quick enough, to replace old fields that are being depleted.
In the short term we have the prospect of a very hot summer and increased demand for air conditioning as a result. We also have forecast one of the most active hurricane seasons on record.
These short term events could make gas a high return investment even quicker than expected.
Finally, this high return investment is ecologically friendly it’s clean and many people like this, so it is the fuel of choice for many.
Investing in gas is easy
At present prices are 50% below their recent highs, a bottom is forming and we expect prices to go higher.
Trading the move
You don’t need a fund manager here; all you need is to get in the market with options to take advantage of this high return investment.
Options offer you the prospect of unlimited gains with risk limited to just the premium paid. Investors therfore should buy at, or in the money options at current levels, with plenty of time value to expiry, to ride out short term volatility.
A simple investment
However, that does not mean that this one will not become a high return investment!
Consider the facts above and decide for yourself.
If you want a diversification away from boring under performing mutual funds and to have the prospect of gains that will make your fund manager green with envy, then consider doing it for yourself and a high return investment such as natural gas.
About John Labunski about john labunski John E Labunski John LabunskiUS Economy Heading for a Hard Landing
October 22nd, 2008
The US economy is in far worse shape than many in the US think, and is heading for a hard landing.
American consumers, who account for 70% of demand and consumption in the huge, $US14.4 trillion economy, are in trouble and cutting back spending, thanks to falling levels of credit.
In fact the credit cuts are now much deeper than anyone thought after the release of up to date figures.
The IMF said overnight that the US appeared to be sinking into a recession, it said.
The Fund said in its latest World Economic Outlook that the US was now poised to expand 1.6% this year and a bare 0.1% in 2009.
That was an increase of 0.3% and a decrease of 0.7%, respectively from the prior forecast just three months ago, in which the IMF had lifted its April WEO forecasts, citing improving economic conditions in the US.
That improvement for this year relates to the 2.8% rise in second quarter economic growth.
The estimates were made before the latest figures though on consumer borrowing which tell a story of US consumers cutting back, or being cut back on credit, the lifeblood of the economy.
Figures for September store sales from some major retailers overnight showed sluggish growth for most, with downturns for those selling more expensive products, such as department stores.
Wall Mart managed a 2.4% rise in same store sales, but that was less than forecast, discount bulk chains lost Costco did OK, but Target reported a 3% drop in comparable store sales.
JC Penny, the big department store chain reported a massive 12.4% drop in same store sales in September, far worse than expected.
But it’s no wonder after the Fed’s earlier report.
Figures Tuesday night from the Federal Reserve on consumer credit show the biggest fall in the history of the recorded figures.
At the same time major industrial, Alcoa, suffered a 52% drop in third quarter earnings and has joined the mighty General Electric in eliminating a share buyback to conserve capital.
The national body for US car dealers warned that 700 would go out of business this year alone, and more would follow in 2009, if the credit freeze was not eased soon. Car sales fell 27% last month and the way the credit freeze is working, that drop will increase in the coming quarter.
And in a dramatic move the Fed extended the boundaries of its ‘Lender of Last Resort’ understanding by supplanting temporarily the frozen $US1.6 trillion commercial paper market, the day to day lifeblood for American business activity.
At the same time Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke held out hopes for a rate cut, but said the US economy was heading into tougher times.
The Fed said it would set up a new Commercial Paper Funding Facility to buy three-month debt from banks and non-financial companies.
It’s probably one of its most important decisions because if this vital short term debt can’t be rolled over for US companies (end employers) when it falls due; the American economy will be crunched to a halt.
The move was desperately needed with figures showing that 28% of the market would fall due this week and a further 12% next week.
The Fed’s figures last Friday showed that in the week to last Wednesday, the market had already contracted $US215 billion in the past three weeks and virtually all new lending was being done overnight.
If that 28% to 40% of that huge amount can’t be rolled over, the US economy will be crunched by the end of October at the latest, so the Fed had to act.
Without the Fed’s move to being a sort of bank, the US economy will crunch to a complete halt in a matter of weeks, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work and setting off a domino chain of corporate failures across all sectors.
This freeze in the commercial paper market is why the likes of Alcoa and GE have cut their share buybacks and why Bank of America cut its dividend by 50% and is seeking to raise $US10 billion in new capital.
It has to support the acquisitions of Countrywide Financial Services and Merrill Lynch and the added burdens they will impose on its finances: but it is like all other banks and has cut lending across the board.,
But it’s clear consumers, the engine of the US economy, were being denied credit by banks and other lenders well before the eruption of this latest phase when the credit crunch turned to a freeze.But there’s nothing the Fed can do immediately to ease the squeeze on consumers: each week tens of thousands of them are losing their jobs, their homes, having their pay cut and hours trimmed and are being denied credit at a rate not thought possible until the Fed released the credit figures for August, a month before the crisis worsened with the spate of failures and bailouts in the US starting with Lehman Brothers.
The Fed reported that consumer credit fell by $US7.9 billion in August, the biggest fall since the statistics began being collected in 1943, to $US2.58 trillion.
Bloomberg said that economists forecast an increase of $US5 billion in consumer credit during August, so the Fed’s report came as a complete shock to the market.
Total consumer borrowing dropped at a rate of 4.3% in August, the most since January 1998.
Revolving debt such as credit cards decreased by $US612 million during August and non-revolving debt, including auto loans, dropped by $US7.3 billion.
That fall was a month before the 27% plunge in US car sales last month, so it’s likely that consumer credit again fell sharply in September.
The news of the Fed’s move and the sharp contraction in consumer credit (one of the Fed’s ‘Key Economic Indicators makes it easier to understand the contents of a speech overnight by chairman, Ben Bernanke in which he painted a gloomy picture of the US economy.
He would have known of the move to try and stop the rot in the commercial paper market and the sharp fall in consumer credit, so it was no wonder he was saying:
“Economic activity had shown signs of decelerating even before the recent upsurge in financial-market tensions.
As has been the case for some time, the housing market continues to be a primary source of weakness in the real economy as well as in the financial markets. However, the slowdown in economic activity has spread outside the housing sector.
“Private payrolls have continued to contract, and the declines in employment, together with earlier increases in food and energy prices, have eroded the purchasing power of households. This sluggishness of real incomes, together with tighter credit and declining household wealth, is now showing through more clearly to consumer spending.
“Indeed, since May, real consumer outlays have contracted significantly. Meanwhile, in the business sector, worsening sales prospects and a heightened sense of uncertainty have begun to weigh more heavily on investment spending as well.
“The intensification of financial turmoil and the further impairment of the functioning of credit markets seem likely to increase the restraint on economic activity in the period ahead.”
“All told, economic activity is likely to be subdued during the remainder of this year and into next year. The heightened financial turmoil that we have experienced of late may well lengthen the period of weak economic performance and further increase the risks to growth.
“To support growth and reduce the downside risks, continued efforts to stabilize the financial markets are essential. The Federal Reserve will continue to use the tools at its disposal to improve market functioning and liquidity.”
Meanwhile the chairwoman of the National Automobile Dealers Association says the credit crunch and economic problems are likely to cause 700 auto dealers in the US to go under this year.
Speaking to the Automotive Press Association in Detroit, Annette Sykora said quick action will be needed to ease the squeeze and restore consumer confidence and help the industry.
An estimated 94% of American car buyers finance their purchases, Ms Sykora says but even those with good to high scores and solid credit records can’t get financing.
Dealers with good credit also are having trouble getting financing for their inventories.
It’s the same story in home lending and also in credit cards where credit lines and revolving credit arrangements are being terminated or refused.
According to the National Auto Dealers Association, there are around 20,000 auto dealers in the US. About 430 dealerships closed last year and 295 closed in 2006.
The estimate of 700 dealers going out of business does not include new dealers that will enter the market.
According to the Fed’s credit figures, lenders were cutting back on car loans (and other credit in August) and car sales fell 11% in the month. The 27% fall in September reflects the intensification of the credit freeze and helps explain why car sales sank 27% to less than 1 million for the month for the first time since 1993.
Some buyers are not committing because they fear for their jobs or can’t get the right vehicle when they are looking for more fuel-efficient models.
Regardless of the reason, it means consumers are spending less. September’s retail sales figures are out in about 10 days or so and are likely to make miserable reading, along with the consumer spending figures a little later in October.
IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.
Author: Australasian Investment Review
A Beginners Guide to Property Investment.
October 9th, 2008
Author: Keith McGregor
It is plain to see how just one of the above factors would be sufficient to stir great interest in property investment.
No matter what your reason is for choosing property investment, there are several crucial factors to consider before searching for the right property.
There are many methods which can be applied to property investment, dependent on your goals and what you want to achieve. Without going into further depth and variation, this can be broken down into two general aims:
1. Buy to Sell – Buying and selling investment property within the short term for profit.
2. Buy to Let – Buying and letting to achieve a rental income and accumulate equity, normally over the mid to long term.
It is important to decide which route to go down, as this will very much depend on the property most suitable to invest in and how best to set this up.
Property investment can be extremely rewarding but should only be entered into with due care and consideration.
There are many crucial factors to consider which will determine which direction you will move in when considering the endless property investment possibilities.
Careful consideration must be given to location. You must decide if you wish to invest in your local area which you may be more familiar with, or invest in a current “hotspot” which may provide more attractive investment options.
The more adventurous investor may be interested in overseas property investment. A great deal of care and research should be given to any investment property proposition, particularly when looking overseas where the purchase process, tax liabilities, etc. could be very different to the UK.
Property price must also be considered, with widely varying properties available at all levels of investment. Investors tend to be guided by the capital they wish to invest in any one property.
A mortgage broker or lender will be able to advise you on how much you can borrow to invest in property, along with any further costs or fees involved. A Solicitor can also advise you on the legal costs, disbursements (local search fees, etc.) and stamp duty cost if applicable.
Once these factors have been considered, the next step in property investment would be to search for suitable properties and undertake the essential research to minimise risk and maximise profit.
You can never do too much research. Speak to local agents to get feedback from the perspective of property professionals.
Properties which are ideal for investment will inevitably sell quickly. Time consuming research can unfortunately result in astute investors missing out on some great investment opportunities. The internet can be a great place to carry out a large portion of the required research in a fraction of the time.
The above serves well as an introduction to property investment and the first steps which should be undertaken. By gaining a good perspective of your goals and aims and by not deviating from your chosen investment plan, you should form a solid basis for successful property investment.
John E Labunski John LabunskiJohn Labunski, Investing During Retirement To Maintain The Good Life
December 14th, 2007
Author: Lois Center-Shabazz
Posted by John Labunski

Investing during retirement is different than investing for retirement. In investing during retirement seniors need to weigh and measure several different factors to assure that their money last for all necessities, and if they want to leave some money to your children or grandchildren.A senior citizens retirement nest egg must be well thought out and closely monitored.
1. Life expectancy
Calculate what you feel your life expectancy is considering how long your parents lived and your current health status is.
2. Inflation rate
Know what the current rate of inflation is and what the continuing rate of inflation will be. This will chip away at your fixed income.
3. Taxes
Know how much you will have to pay in taxes and how your income will be taxed. This is the largest expense you will have if you are subject to income and homeowners tax.
4. Health Cost
Know if your health cost will be covered, and if not, how much will you have to pay toward your health cost? Will you be covered by Medicare or a private health insurance, and what will your out-of-pocket cost be.
5. Low risk investing
What are the best low risk investments you can put your money into for safety and convenience. Be careful, some retirees loose their entire nest egg because some slick financial advisor talks them into a so-called high interest investment, which is also high risk investment. Investing is over during retirement. All investments should be very low risk income investing. If you don’t understand investments, put your money in savings accounts or money market accounts.
John Labunski
6. Rent or own home
Will you rent during retirement or live in a house that is paid for but has yearly taxes, electrical, water, and maintenance cost. Sometimes it is better to sell your home, live off the proceeds and rent a low income senior apartment, which can also be a safer place to live.
7. Debts paid off
Will you have all of your debts paid off. This can save you mountains of money in unnecessary interest charges, which are very costly.
8. Retirement recreation
What do you want to do during retirement? Are you content to stay home and garden, sew, cook, and talk with other retired neighbors? Or do you want to travel. You need to figure the amount it will cost you to travel or practice hobbies.
9. Education and trust
Educate yourself about your investments and the retirement income you will receive. Know exactly how much you have coming, how much you can get on a monthly basis, and how long you can make it last considering all of the above.
Don’t trust strangers to advise you about your retirement money unless you have first educated yourself and verified that they, and their business is honest. Again, many seniors loose their nest egg to dishonest businesses and/or their dishonest advisors.
To know more about John Labunski please visit http://johnlabunski.com
Investing for Retirement, The New Way Posted by John Labunski
December 14th, 2007
Author: Michael Russell
John Labunski

One of the biggest myths in investing funds to your retirement portfolio is that the investor should stick to mainly conservative investments such as bonds and cash reserves. The idea is that as you grow older, you’ll need money more readily, so playing it safe is the idea here. Interestingly, there’s an old method of determining your asset allocation by subtracting your age from 100. The difference is the amount (percentage) that you should devote your assets to for stocks. So a 60 year old person would have 40% in stocks. Sounds like a plan? Not for many.Today, the retirement investing may not have the same goals for various reasons. One, the age of retirement could vary dramatically. Individuals could retire in their 80s, or others may want to retire in their 60s, depending on their retirement assets.
There are also investors who have saved very little for retirement. Often they find themselves in a catch-up mode. This isn’t the age-old pension plan that older generations relied on for their savings. More retirement plans are now defined benefit plans so the plan participant will have to provide how much they will contribute and how they will allocate their investments.
Sometimes, you’ll find investors not willing to place part of their paychecks for retirement. It behoves individuals facing a close retirement to accelerate their contributions and place assets in more aggressive stocks. Since aggressive assets such as stocks can help you increase your returns, catch-up employees need to weigh investment risks and returns carefully.
Retirement participants also underestimate their longevity and as such, they assess their length of retirement incorrectly. As individuals live longer, retirement income may erode over time. Especially for the person that takes the conservative approach to investing, less money may be available during the later years of retirement. One must evaluate other sources of income and determine if these sources can contribute. Consider Social Security or income from a part time job. Such alternatives may allow the investor to rely less on the retirement accounts and allow the person to adjust the allocation accordingly.
John Labunski
The fact remains that the investor needs to assess time horizon, risk tolerance and retirement goals in today’s environment, like any non-retirement portfolio. With people living longer, it makes sense to evaluate your investment portfolio for the long retirement. A 60 year old person thinking that he or she will retire soon may want to consider living in the 90s, a 30 year stretch for the retiree. How does one account this long duration? One would clearly have to account for the time horizon, which means allocate more to stock funds. Remember, stocks outperform bonds in the long run. A person at the age of 60 will be left out if their asset allocation is 40% in stocks. The long-term range may push the investor to take a more aggressive stance such as a 60% stock and 40% bond ratio.
Planning for retirement is not an easy step. One has to assess goals and other factors that will lead to proper asset allocation. More specifically, investors need to consider aggressive vehicles such as stocks, even at the beginning of retirement. There’s still hope. Retirement asset allocation tools are available that can help you plan for retirement. Ask your investment company if they have online calculators, or, simply, go to one of the two largest mutual fund companies. Personal financial advisors are a good way to get professional help as well.
John Labunski